Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Mapapalad ang mga Nahahapis (The Beatitudes, part 3)

 "Mapapalad ang mga nahahapis, sapagkat sila ay aaliwin."
(Mateo 5:4)

Sa nakaraang paskil ay nakita ang una sa mga Beatitudes at ito ay ang mga dukha sa espiritu. Ang sumunod na Beatitude ay nababagay na karugtong nauna: mapalad ang mga nagdadalamhati. Nagdadalamhati sila sa pagkaunawa na sa kanilang karukhaan sa espiritu, sila ay mga makasalanan.

Hindi lahat ng aminado na sila ay mga dukha sa espiritu ay ikinalulungkot ito. Ang iba ay ay nagmamalaki pa at ipinagdiriwang ang kanilang kasalanan. May mga taong sadyang proud na proud pa habang ikinukuwento kung paano sila mangupit sa magulang, mambabae, manlamang sa kapwa, atbp. Maraming ganun sa Israel noong mga panahon na yun. 'Yan ay kung ibabatay sa mensahe ng pangangaral ni Juan Bautista na nabuhay rin sa panahong iyon. Sa Lukas 3 makikita natin na ang mga kasalanang binanatan ni Juan Bautista ay ang korapsyon, ang pang-aabuso sa kapangyarihan, ang pagsasawalang bahala sa mga nangangailangan, at pagsasamantala sa kapwa. Parang katulad rin ng ating kapaanahunan; magmula sa pinakamataas at pinakamababang posisyon may nananamantala upang kumita. Mula sa Senado hanggang sa palengke, may nandadaya. Ito ay araw-araw na nagaganap tila isang normal na bagay lamang. At ito ay hindi nila ikinalulungkot o ikinahihiya.

Ang mga taong nagdiriwang sa kanilang mga kasalanan ay hindi kinalulugdan ng Diyos. Ang mga taong mapapalad ay yung mga tulad na salmista na nagsabing:
    Parang agos na ng batis ang daloy ng aking luha,
dahilan sa mga taong sa utos mo'y sumisira.
(psalm 119:136)

Gayon din ang pagdadalamhati ni Ezra:
Pinalipas niya roon ang magdamag na nagdadalamhati dahil sa kataksilan ng mga bumalik mula sa pagkabihag. Hindi siya kumain ni uminom ng anuman (Ezra 10:6b)

Sa isang iglesyang napasukan ng seksuwal na imoralidad, sila ay pinagsabihan ni Pablo ng ganito:
"At nakukuha pa ninyong magmalaki! Dapat sana'y mahiya kayo at malungkot, at ang taong gumagawa ng ganoon ay dapat ninyong itiwalag! " (1 Cor. 5:2)

Sa halip na tanggapin nila ang nararapat na kaparusahan ng kasalanan, tatanggap pa ng pagpapala ang mga nagluluksa sa kasalanan. Sila ay aaliwin ng Diyos kasabay kalakip ang pagpapatawad (Isa. 40:1-2). Balang araw, ang lahat ng luhang pumatak dulot ng daigdig na ito ay papahirin ng Diyos (Pahayag 7:17)

Mapapalad ang mga Dukha sa Espiritu (The Beatitudes, part 2)




"Mapapalad ang mga dukha sa espiritu,
sapagkat kanila ang kaharian ng langit." (Mateo 5:3) 1

Una sa listahan ng Panginoong Hesus ng mga taong mapapalad ang mga dukha sa espiritu (poor in spirit). Mapalad sila sapagkat sa kanila ang kaharian ng langit (theirs is the kingdom of heaven), ibig sabihin sila ang mga magtatamasa sa mga biyaya ng paghahari ng Mesias sa ngayon at sa hinaharap. Ngunit ano nga ba ang kahulugan ng pagiging dukha sa espiritu.

Ang interpretasyon ng ilan dito ay ganito: "sa langit ang mga mahihirap; sa impyerno ang mayayaman". Mabilis silang tatalon sa kahilerang talata sa Lucas 6:20 kung saan walang nakasulat na "sa Espiritu". Ang angkop na interpretasyon nito ay intindihin ang pagiging dukha sa espiritu bilang kasalatan sa espiritu o spiritual bankruptcy. Sila ang mga taong walang anumang hawak na maipagmamalaki sa Diyos. Wala silang anumang taglay na maihahandog sa Diyos kaya't wala silang magawa kundi dumaing na lamang at mamalimos ng habag. Maaaring hindi naman sila salat sa yaman tulad ni Haring David ngunit kinikilala ang kanilang pangangailangan sa Diyos (Awit 40:17). Magiging kapaki-pakinabang lamang ang pinansyal at materyal na karukhaan kung ang dulot nito ay kapakumbabaan sa harap ng Diyos 2  

Ang kabaligtaran nito ay ang mga taong panatag sa sarili nilang katayuang espirituwal na nag-iisip na may sapat silang mga katangiang taglay upang maging katanggap-tangap sa Diyos. Sa wari nila ay may sapat silang espirituwal na yaman kaya't karapat dapat silang papasukin sa kaharian ng Diyos. Halimbawa nito ay ang Fariseo sa kuwento ni Hesus na ganito manalangin:

'O Diyos, nagpapasalamat ako sa iyo sapagkat hindi ako katulad ng iba na mga magnanakaw, mandaraya, mangangalunya, o kaya'y katulad ng maniningil ng buwis na ito. Dalawang beses akong nag-aayuno sa loob ng sanlinggo at nagbibigay rin ako ng ikasampung bahagi mula sa lahat ng aking kinikita. (Lucas 18:11-12)

Ang taong dukha sa espiritu ay ang maniningil ng buwis na kasabay ng Fariseo na pumasok sa templo. Nakatayo siya sa malayo at 'di makatingin sa langit. Dinadagukan niya ang kanyang dibdib at ang kanyang kahilingan ay ang habag ng Diyos sa tulad niyang makasalanan (Lucas 18:13)

Kung tutuusin ay pareho lang na walang maipagmamalaki ang Fariseo at ang maninigil ng buwis. Pare-pareho lang naman ang lahat ng tao na nagkasala at hindi nakaabot sa kaluwalhatian ng Diyos (Roma 3:23). Yun nga lang hindi alam ng Fariseo at ng iba sa atin na mga dukha sila sa espiritu. Patuloy silang nagmamalaki sa kanilang pagkarelihiyoso at naniniwala silang sapat ang kanilang kabutihan upang mapunta sa langit. Subalit ang mga nakakaunawa na sila ay mga dukha sa espiritu ay aasa lamang sa yaman ng sakripisyo ni Kristo na nagpakadukha sa ikayayaman ng mga sasampalataya sa kanya (2 Corinto 8:9)

Talababa:

1. Ang sipi ng Mateo 5:3 ay mula sa Ang Bagong ang Biblia; ang sipi ng Lucas 18:11-12 ay mula sa Magandang Balita Biblia
2. D. A. Carson: "though poverty is neither a blessing nor a guarantee of spiritual rewards, it can be turned to advantage if it fosters humility before God."  (Matthew, Expositor's Bible Commentary, 1st edition)

Monday, February 9, 2015

Ang Mapapalad (The Beatitudes): Panimula


http://biblehub.com/adb/matthew/5.htm
Dahil sa pagpapagaling ni Hesus sa sari-saring mga karamdaman noong siya ay lumibot sa Galilea, maraming mga tao mula sa iba't ibang lugar ang lumapit sa kanya upang makatanggap ng tulong (Matt. 4:23-25). Nang makita ni Hesus ang natipon na mga tao, siya ay umakyat sa bundok. Ang kanyang pag-upo ay bilang paghahanda sa susunod niyang gagawin. Sa kanilang kultura, ang pag-upo ang karaniwang postura ng mga tagapagturo. Sumunod ang kanyang mga alagad, at nagsimula na ngang magturo si Hesus.

Bagamat ang mga aral na ibabahagi ng guro ay para sa maliit na pangkat ng kanyang mga alagad, walang duda na sinadya niyang lakasan ang kanyang tinig upang ito ay mapakinggan din ng napakaraming mga tao na nagtipon doon. Ang mga aral na ito ay kilala sa tawag na Sermon sa Bundok (Sermon on the Mount). Ito ay napapaloob sa tatlong kabanata ng ebanghelyo ayon kay Mateo (kabanata 5, 6, at 7).

Kung loloobin ng Panginoon, nais kong simulan ngayon ang isang serye ng mga paskil na sasaklaw sa unang bahagi ng Sermon sa Bundok na tinatawag na The Beatitudes. Ito ay galing sa salitang Latin na beautus na ang kahulugan ay "mapalad".

Subalit mas makakatulong sa ating pangunawa kung ang susuriin natin ay ang wikang ginamit ni Mateo noong isulat niya ang kanyang ebanghelyo. Sa wikang Griyego, ang salitang ginamit ay makarios. Ang salitang ito ay tumutukoy sa taong tumanggap ng pabor mula sa Diyos. Napakaganda pala ng pangalang Macario :D

May kahulugan din ito na "masaya", kung kaya't may mga salin ng bibliya tulad ng Good News ay isinalin ito bilang "Happy". 'Yun nga lang, may kailangang linawin. Sa kapanahunan natin, sinasabi nating "happy" tayo ayon sa nararamdaman natin. Halimbawa na lang ay itong ginagamit na sukatan ng Social Weather Stations (SWS)1. Ang tinatanong nila sa kanilang mga survey ay: "Kung iisipin ninyo ang inyong buhay sa kabuuan sa ngayon, masasabi ba ninyo na kayo ay... " Ang pagpipiliang mga sagot ay:
  • talagang masaya
  • medyo masaya
  • talagang hindi masaya

Natural, ang resulta ay nakabatay sa pabago-bago at pansariling pakiramdam (subjective feelings) ng mga tinatanong. Subalit ang salitang makarios ay hindi nakasalalay sa kung ano ang pakiramdam natin. Paliwanag ni  Willoughby Allen, ang kasiyahang tinutukoy ng makarios ay:

"a state not of inner feeling on the part of those to whom it is applied, but of blessedness from an ideal point of view in the judgment of others"2

Sa pagkakataong ito, ang gumagawa ng "judgment of others" ay si Hesus. Ito ang mga taong pinagpala at "masaya" ayon sa Panginoon. At kung si Hesus ang nagbigay ng pananaw, maaari ba naman siyang magkamali? Siyempre hindi. Kung sinabi niyang pinagpala ka, pinagpala ka nga. Iyan ang dapat ikagalak.

Sa mga susunod na paskil ng seryeng ito, iisa-isahin natin ang mga katangian ng mga taong pinagpala ayon sa ating Panginoon.
 ----------------

Talababa:

1. Fourth Quarter 2013 Social Weather Survey, http://www.sws.org.ph/pr20140227.htm

2. Willoughby C. Allen, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to S. Matthew. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1912 (sinipi ni D. A. Carson sa Matthew, Expositor's Bible Commentary, 1st edition)

Friday, November 28, 2014

When We Are Confronted With God's Holiness (Isaiah 6:1-8): Tinubos blog's 6th anniversary post

ISAIAH 6:1-8 (NIV 1984)
In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord seated on a throne, high and exalted, and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him were seraphs, each with six wings: With two wings they covered their faces, with two they covered their feet, and with two they were flying. And they were calling to one another:
  "Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty;
    the whole earth is full of his glory."

At the sound of their voices the doorposts and thresholds shook and the temple was filled with smoke.

    "Woe to me!" I cried. "I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the LORD Almighty."

    Then one of the seraphs flew to me with a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with tongs from the altar. With it he touched my mouth and said, "See, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away and your sin atoned for."

    Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?"
    And I said, "Here am I. Send me!"
----------------------
Photo credit: David A Ziser at Digital ProTalk

Unlike all other elective positions, the Constitution makes no provision for the reelection of the nation's chief executive. That means as long as this Constitution is in effect, we will have a new president every six years, except in cases where a person who has succeeded as President has only served for less than four years and decides to run for the same office just like Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo who served for a total of more than nine years.

We also know that whenever a new president is elected, there will be changes. For no two presidents are exactly alike; each one will have his own personality and leadership style. Each one will also have different sets of friends and preferences so the cabinet will not remain the same.

In chapter 6, Isaiah tells his story on how he was called to be a prophet. He was called in a year of impending change, for it was in the year King Uzziah died. This king's reign lasted 52 years. To put that into perspective, that is one and a half years longer than the periods of Marcos, Cory, Ramos, Erap, GMA and Pnoy combined (assuming Pnoy would finish his term and step down in 2016).

We could imagine the prevailing uncertainty in the hearts and minds of the Israelites in the year he died because this king managed the nation well. The account of his reign in 2 Chronicles shows he was a good administrator. During his reign, the water supply was improved, agriculture flourished, and the national defense was fortified. He even spearheaded a research project for the innovation of their weapons. Imagine a king who would deliver an impressive State of the Nation Address(SONA) year after year for five straight decades!

In the later part of his life, he took a spiritually fatal step. Because of his accomplishments, pride was conceived in his heart. He disregarded the law by doing the work of the priests. And when confronted with his sin, he responded in anger. As a consequence, he was struck by the Lord with leprosy and lived in isolation. Yet, still nothing changed the fact that he was a good administrator, and his death is a big change in the lives of the people.

Isaiah tells his story that in the year the great earthy king died, he saw the greater King in heaven. In the year that the life of the mortal king ended, Isaiah saw the immortal King whose reign will never end. Kings and kingdoms; emperors and empires will all pass away. But as for the one enthroned in heaven, he will go on reigning forever and ever. Psalm 90:2 says "From everlasting to everlasting, you are God". There is a King in heaven-- greater than those who are currently reigning here on earth so we have a reason to hope whatever takes place here on earth.

Isaiah's experience here was similar to John in Patmos whose eyes and senses were suddenly opened to witness what the normal eyes and senses could not see and perceive (Rev. 1:10, 4:2)

“I saw the LORD!”, Isaiah claimed. But when he described what he saw, these are all he could describe:
  • the position of the throne
  • the hem of the robe
  • the seraphims surrounding him

Suppose a friend told you that the reigning Miss Universe visited his baranggay and that there was a point when she was only a few steps away from him. Of course your curiosity was awakened so you asked your friend, “How does the reigning Miss Universe look like?” To your disappointment, all your friend describes are the following:

  • her yellow skirt
  • her floral headband
  • her personal assistants

I myself would be frustrated with your friend. I don't care about the skirt color. I don't care about the floral headband. I don't care about her personal assistants. All I want to know is what the beauty queen looks like in person!

As for Isaiah however, we must remember that the Lord's prophet is not stupid. We could assume that he was trying to give the best description of the things he saw. But what more could he do when what he saw were beyond words? That's why we sing:

You are beautiful beyond description
Too marvelous for words
Too wonderful for comprehension
Like nothing ever seen or heard

Let us therefore get the most out of the descriptions he gave us.

The position of his throne (seated on a throne, high and exalted) and the hem of his robe (the train of his robe filled the temple) is about his unequaled majesty and authority by any other power (Rev. 19:16; Psalm 2:2-4). As for the seraphims around him who each had six pair of wings, we must remember that God wisely designs his creatures for their habitat and their survival. Fins and gills for the fish, shell for the turtle, strength for the bear, speed for the cat, etc. The seraphims were given different sets of wings to cover themselves because they are moment by moment exposed to the majesty and holiness of God. They needed that to survive!

More than their appearance, we should pay attention to what they are saying. They call out to each other:

"Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty;
the whole earth is full of his glory."

The word “Holy” is mentioned three times for emphasis and intensity. It indicates how awed they are. One aspect of holiness is morally purity-- freedom from sin and unrighteousness. But that could not be the message the angels are emphasizing here; for they themselves are holy inhabitants of heaven. They are also morally pure

I think what's being emphasized here is another aspect of holiness which is solitariness. He is separate. He is totally of a different class; he is not like us or any other thing in existence.

There is a category for angels.
There is a category for men.
There is another category for eagles; and another for worms.

Yet angels, men, eagles and worms are all mere creatures. Only one is separate as the Creator. He is matchless. He is without peer. He is holy, holy, holy.

His perfections in all his character and attributes convey his matchless beauty and splendor, so we are told by the psalmist:

“Ascribe to the LORD the glory due his name; worship the LORD in the splendor of his holiness.” (Psalm 29:2)

The seraphims also declare that “The whole earth is filled with his glory.”

Earthly kings extend their glory by conquering other territories. The bigger the area, the greater glory for the king. The angels declare that there is no portion of the earth where the glory of the Lord is not present. He does whatever pleases him in Asia, Europe, North and South America, Africa and the whole universe (Psalm 135:6).

The purpose by which he created this world is for his glory. And there is no part of this world which is not for this purpose even the place you call your home or your personal and private room. Are you glorifying him in these places? Or are you in rebellion? Submit now or pay the consequence later! Are you in submission to the King?

What Isaiah saw was a frightening scene. The place was shaking as if there is an earthquake. Smoke filled the place as if a volcano erupted. By this time Isaiah can't take it anymore. He cried “Woe to me! I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the LORD Almighty.” (Isaiah 6:5)

Let us enumerate three things that happened when we are confronted with God's holiness.

1. When we are confronted with God's Holiness, we see the depths of our sin.
Isaiah saw the filthiness of his lips. Filthy lips indicate a filthy heart.

Luke 6:43 -45 ”No good tree bears bad fruit, nor does a bad tree bear good fruit. Each tree is recognized by its own fruit. People do not pick figs from thornbushes, or grapes from briers. The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks.”

It's not just the mouth, but all our body parts are dirty because we all use them in our enjoyment of sin. When confronted with God's holiness, you will be grieved by all the unholy things you did by which you involved your eyes, your hands, your feet, your brain and the rest of your body parts.

Notice also that it breaks spiritual pride in Isaiah for he put himself on equal footing as the rest – to the people he lives among with.

Isaiah's account also gives us an idea of what it fells to be truly blessed. Without being confronted with God's holiness, one may think he is blessed when in reality he is not.

Social Media give you an idea of what people are doing daily: the restaurant they recently visited, the wedding ceremony they attended, what they sketched on paper when bored at work, etc. On a particular Sunday, one professing Christian posted a status at 12 noon. He informed everyone that he was present at this particular church, and that he was "feeling blessed". If that is true, then well and good! Praise the Lord!

Yet at 1pm, he posted another status. He's watching a Sunday noontime show and proudly told the whole world that he was enjoying a sensual dance number by a well-known sexy actress. I doubt the truthfulness of his claim 60 minutes earlier that he was blessed.

I would tell you what a blessed man looks like upon attending a worship service. (see 1 Corinthians 14:24-25). He comes in with sins he secretly nourishes. But in the community of saints, by the ministry of the word, the secret issues of his heart are addressed. He will fall down in humility and worship God. He then concludes that God is present in the assembly. That's what a blessed man looks like.

If secret sins are not dealt with; if after attending a worship service, you did not feel the holiness of God confronting your sin, I doubt if you were really blessed. Perhaps you enjoyed the music in the same way you enjoy the FM radio. Perhaps you enjoyed the pretty faces and friendly smiles of those in attendance. Perhaps you enjoyed the preacher's punchlines. Well the best way to describe what you have just experienced is that you have been entertained. It is one thing to be blessed and another thing to be entertained. They are not the same.

2. When we are confronted with God's Holiness, we realize that we are deserving of punishment and in need of salvation.
“Woe is me” is the opposite of blessing. It was used by Isaiah in this book at least 20 times to indicate that the Lord is about to repay evil deeds. It is fair to say that it's a well-used part of Isaiah's prophetic vocabulary. But before he ever uttered a woe upon others, he first issued the woe upon himself. Recognizing God as holy, holy, holy means acknowledging he has every right and authority to inflict punishment upon us.

One of the principles I use when sharing the good news is this: Bad news before the good news.

One must first be confronted with who God is and what he demands. Then show the prospect how he failed, and that he cannot save himself. It must be clear before him that he is in trouble before the holy God, unless God himself provides the remedy. Only after hearing the bad news will he be ready for the good news of forgiveness and cleansing.

Such is the case of Isaiah. God did not immediately cleanse his dirty lips. He first showed him his holiness so that Isaiah might see his sinfulness and realize the bad news. When Isaiah understood the bad news, then he was ready for the good news: God's provision of cleansing and forgiveness.

In verse 6, one of the seraphims flew toward Isaiah with a burning coal with him. As he came nearer and nearer, Isaiah might have had thought this is punishment for him. The seraphim would harm him with the burning coal. The seraphim finally came close enough to Isaiah and with the coal, he touched Isaiah's lips, one of the most sensitive of our external parts. To Isaiah's surprise, the coal did not harm him. On the contrary, it did him good. His iniquity was taken away and impurity cleansed.

To whoever is broken by God's holiness, he is ready for the next step. The forgiveness and cleansing through the blood of God's son (Ephesians 1:7)

3. When we are confronted with God's holiness, we are convicted that the majestic King must be served
So far the one who sits on the throne hasn't spoken yet. Now he does. He announces a job vacancy in his Kingdom. He was looking for a prophet. God announced this vacancy to a sinner named Isaiah. That's grace. In fact all the workers the Lord has ever hired were all sinners.

Having been cleansed, Isaiah did not hesitate to join the King's work force. He replied, "Here am I. Send me."

Up to this day, there are vacancies in the Lord's field:
"The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field." (Luke 10:2)

In whatever capacity the Lord has gifted and equipped us, let us serve him. The writer of Hebrews tells us that the blood of Christ cleansed us that we may serve the living God (Hebrews 9:14). Each one should use whatever gift he has received to serve others, faithfully administering God's grace in its various forms (1 Peter 4:10) and that for the praise of God through Jesus Christ (1 Peter 4:11).

Serving God would not be easy. Isaiah's task was hard for he was sent to a people who would not receive the word. There rarely was a “prayed to receive Christ” (PRC) check mark on his evangelism blitz report sheets. Yet Isaiah persevered. It was in the year of Uzziah's death when he was called, and he lived and served in the times of three more kings: Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah-- 53 years of faithfulness in a ministry full of heartbreak. Yet it is all worth it when you think about the privilege of serving the holy, holy, holy God.

My final word for all of us--- for us who have unclean mouths, hands, feet, hearts and minds. Let us continue exposing ourselves to the word of God. For in it the holiness of God is revealed. It is the only hope for morally corrupt men and women.


---------------------- 

Works consulted:
  • Raymond Ortlund, Jr.; Isaiah: God Saves Sinners (Preaching the Word Series; Crossway Books 2005
  • R. C. Sproul; The Holiness of God (Tyndale House Publishers 1985, 1998)

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

We Shall Be With the Glorious Christ (John 17:24)

I was very much blessed with my study of Isaiah 6. Since November is Tinubos blog's anniversary month, I'm planning to post that material later this month. If the Lord wills, it will be posted on the 28th, the very day Tinubos was born way back in 2008. For the meantime, I'm posting this material which is really a spillover from my study of Isaiah 6.

This is also to grant the request of She Yap and Chewvy Orlanes. They graciously visited Guiding Light Dagupan and heard me preach this material on the afternoon of August 3. Thank you dear friends; I'm sorry for the delay. Though slightly modified, this is essentially the same message given to us on that blessed afternoon.
 -------------------

There is a verse in the New Testament that links Jesus Christ to the high and lofty vision of God's glory in Isaiah 6; that verse is John 12:42 where it is written:"Isaiah said this because he saw Jesus' glory and spoke about him." John identified Jesus as the one whom Isaiah saw; the YHWH whose glory fills the whole earth.

Yet that was far from obvious on Jesus' days here on earth. While the king in Isaiah's vision possessed a blazing glory that even angels must cover their eyes, the carpenter  from Nazareth looked so ordinary. People saw no beauty, no majesty in him. The Pharisees and the Sadducees saw nothing special in him. Pilate and Herod saw him as a powerless suspect on trial. The crowd mocked him. The soldiers scourged. They spit on him, probably on his face.

Yet there will come a day when Jesus will be revealed in his full glory. When he comes, people would rather wish to be buried alive than to face the Wrath of the Lamb (Revelation 6:16)

This glory was the first concern of Jesus when he opened his prayer at Gethsemane (John 17:1-5). He wants it back-- that blinding splendor which was veiled when he took the form of a servant. After praying for other matters (verses 6-23), he returns to the first concern in verse 24, so that his disciples would see that glory when they shall finally be reunited in the end. His specific prayer was:

NIV 1984

I would like to share three things we are assured of based on this short prayer item of the Lord:

First, this assures us that we ain't seen nothing yet.
Yes the disciples saw glimpses of his glory. They witnessed him turn water into wine. They heard him command the winds and the winds obeyed. Demons trembled before him. He made the sick well. He made the lame walk. He made the blind see. He raised the dead back to life and other things too many to mention.

And you my friend, if you have been a Christian long enough, there is no doubt that you have your own experiences of answered prayers and other wonderful things. Yet we have not yet seen the best of who Jesus is. We have not yet experienced the best of what Jesus has prepared for us. We will be with him and see his unveiled glory. We will be awed by his infinite majesty moment by moment and it will be unending. It will be an eternity of pleasures and joy in his presence (Psalm 16:11)

Second, this assures us that all our present troubles will soon melt away in the presence of Christ.
When the disciples began to understand that Jesus would soon leave them, their hearts were immediately filled with grief. As early as in chapter 14, Jesus has already presented the cure to that grief-- that is the promise of reunion with him (John 14:1-3).

Jesus' request in John 17:24 for his followers to be with him shows that he wants eternal comforts for us. We could then look beyond our present sufferings; they are not worth comparing to the glory that shall be revealed in us (Rom. 8:18). "Our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all" (2 Cor. 4:17). Our Shepherd will lead us to the springs of living water, and there God will wipe every tear from our eyes (Rev. 7:17).

Third, this assures us that we will be changed into a people that fully enjoys God's glory.
From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible's testimony is consistent: Sinners don't enjoy the glory of God:
  • After eating the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve hid themselves among the trees upon hearing that the Lord is approaching (Gen. 3:8).
  • After hearing God spoke the ten commandments, the Israelites saw a frightening sight. The mountain was covered with smoke. Lightning flashed followed by the deafening sound of thunder. They trembled in fear. So they ask Moses, "Speak to us yourself and we will listen. But do not have God speak to us or we will die." (Exodus 20:18-19)
  • Isaiah saw God's glory and his conclusion was, "Woe to me... I am ruined!"
  • Earlier we saw that people would prefer being buried alive than face the Glorious Lamb (Rev. 6:16)
The presence of a holy and glorious God is a threat to sinners. But with Jesus' request in John 17:24, we are assured that someday we would be transformed into beings fully capable of enjoying God's glory. Facing God will no longer be a threat but a blessing (Matt. 5:8). Through the process of sanctification, the transformation has already began and it shall be completed when we are finally reunited with our Lord (1 John 3:2)

You may ask, "Will I ever arrive at that?"
Well, who doubts the potency of Jesus' prayer?  If you have put your trust solely on the Lord Jesus Christ for your eternal destiny, then this prayer is for you.

James picked Elijah as an example of a righteous man whose prayer is powerful and effective (James 5:16b-18). If a mere mortal's prayer is powerful and effective, how much more with the sinless Jesus Christ who has been in indescribable intimacy with his Father before the world began. "YES" we shall be with the glorious Christ and shall enjoy him forever.


Saturday, September 13, 2014

The Cause of Fights and Quarrels (James 4:1-6)




The death of Andres Bonifacio at the hands not of foreign enemies but of fellow revolutionaries remind us that even in an organization which is supposed to be working towards a common goal, serious internal disputes may arise.

There are conflicts in the home.
There are conflicts in the workplace.
There are conflicts in the classroom.
There are conflicts in the Senate.
There are conflicts baranggays.
There are conflicts in sports teams.

There are conflicts in a band.
There are conflicts business partnerships.
 

If the Overseas Workers' Association of Luzon (OWAL) will be organized abroad this year, don't be surprised if in the following year there will be a splinter group to be called Overseas Workers' Association of Pangasinan (OWAP). Out of the smaller group, an even smaller group may form the Overseas Workers' Association of Central Pangasinan (OWACenPang), and out OWACenPang, no one could stop a member from forming OWAM- the Overseas Workers' Association of Malasiqui.

Fights and quarrels are everywhere; from the the smallest organizations to the gigantic ones. This is consistent with the Scripture's testimony: before regeneration, "We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another." (Titus 3:3b)

How about the church? Ideally, she should be different compared to other earthly communities. After all, when the church was newly born, the believers were described as having “one in heart and mind” (Acts 4:32). She received a direct command from her Lord that her members should love one another (John 13:34-35) Yet the church is a work in progress; her members are still far from the ideal of perfect love towards each other. We have had witnessed several church splits. We know about Christians who are not in good terms with each other. We will to go James 4:1-61 that we may further understand this problem and what we can do about it.


If we think this is the problem of the modern church only, our text indicates that this was a problem in the early church as well. James was addressing the problem of fights and quarrels within the assembly of believers. In James 4:1-2, James identifies the immediate cause of fights and quarrels and expands to the broader cause in verses 3-6
 

The Immediate Cause Identified: UNCONTROLLABLE INWARD EVIL DESIRES
Ask Ernie what started the fight between him and Bert. He tells you, “It's Bert's fault! He took away my loaf of bread.” 


Turning to Bert, he counters “It's Ernie's fault! The loaf of bread was too large for him yet he didn't want to share some to a starving man.”

We however must dig deeper to identify the cause of the strife. In the Scripture before us, James started by asking a rhetorical question expecting his readers to agree with his analysis.
 

James 4:1 What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don't they come from your desires that battle within you? 

The word translated as “desire” in the NIV is hedone in the original Greek. It means that which produces enjoyment”. It's what makes you feel good.2 

We enjoy ice cream; we enjoy music; we enjoy nature; we enjoy humor. But it is more than those. The verse further says “it battles within you”. John MacArthur describes this as "… the war of the unbeliever’s flesh with his soul and conscience, which, despite the corruption of the Fall, has enough awareness of God and His truth to be disturbed when he sins.”3 

I'll point out where I agree with MacArthur and where I disagree. I agree that when men are so committed to their desires, they suppress their awareness of God's standard just to fulfill their desires. I disagree with MacArthur when he limits this propensity to unbelievers. Conflicts within the church may be at times caused by unregenerate men and women infiltrating the body. Yet conflicts may also be caused by genuine born again believers. There are times when true yet imperfect Christians may suppress the truth in the name of gratifying fleshly desires.

These desires not only suppress internal restraints like consience and knowledge of truth. They also suppress outward restraints. It is committed to remove all the barriers to his happiness, even it means resorting to the most drastic measure of all, namely murder. 

James 4:2a-- You want something but don't get it. You kill and covet, but you cannot have what you want. You quarrel and fight.

Donald Burdick comments: 
"James pictures these pleasures as residing within his readers, there carrying on a bitter campaign to gain satisfaction. Pleasure is the overriding desire of their lives. Nothing will be allowed to stand in the way of its realization."4 

By God's common grace, crime investigators know this very well. In identifying suspects, they always look for the possible motives behind the crime.
  • It could be a political rivalry: A politician's burning desire is to be the mayor of a city, yet the polls show that his rival will win by a wide margin. So he resorts to hiring an assassin to get rid of that man who is the hindrance to his happiness.
  • It could be a love triangle: One's burning desire is for a certain woman to reciprocate his affections. Yet the woman chooses a 3rd party (karibal sa pag-ibig). So the suspect repeatedly hammered the victim's head because he was an obstacle to his happiness.
Murders or attempted murders recorded in the Bible follow the same pattern

  • Saul's thoughts of killing David started when he realized that the young man is more popular that him, thus a threat to his throne (1 Samuel 18:6-11).
  • David himself was guilty of murder when he planned for the death of Uriah. The cause? Because he wants to avoid the explosion of the scandal between him and Bathsheba, Uriah's wife (2 Samuel 11).
  • King Ahab badly wants Naboth's piece of land so much that he offers to buy it or exchange it in a barter for a better vineyard. Yet Naboth refused because he inherited it from his ancestors. So Jezebel, Ahab's queen plotted the murder (1 Kings 21:1-16)
They are all the same. Someone is a hindrance to your happiness, so he must vanish. “This life in my womb shall ruin my career plans,” says a young woman. “I must go to an abortion clinic.” 

Remember also that murder is not just taking out the life of a person; it also includes bitter anger against him (Matthew 5:21-22). A son says in his heart “I want to inherit that lot near the road,” yet the parents gave him the lot behind it and gave his desired lot to a younger sibling. So he resolves, “I'm gonna hate my brother with all my heart for all the days of our lives.”. He did not shed the blood of his brother as Cain did, but in his heart, he murders his brother daily.

There is a righteous way by which we may obtain the things we desire. That is through prayer-- expressing our desires before God without hating anyone. Yet oftentimes we don't pray. 

James 4:2c “You do not have, because you do not ask God. 

Prayer springs from the conviction that we are powerless to acquire lasting happiness for ourselves and that only God is able to satisfy the deepest longings of our souls. If you don't have that conviction, of course, you will not pray.

In verse 6 of Hebrews 11, a chapter about men of faith, we find that
  1. Men of faith come to God
  2. Men of faith believe that the God of the Bible exists
  3. Men of faith believe God rewards those who earnestly seek him
Without these, it is “impossible to please God”, and a conclusive manifestation that you are indeed a man of faith is that you pray and submit your desires before God. A man of faith takes God at his word when he reads from his Bible. Delight yourself in the LORD and he will give you the desires of your heart. (Psalm 37:4)

A man of uncontrollable evil desires has no interest in submitting himself to God. What's on his mind is “I want this. I will get it. And I will do it my way.” 

The Broader Cause Identified: WORLDLINESS (4:3-6) 

James 4:3 When you ask, you do not receive, because you ask with wrong motives, that you may spend what you get on your pleasures.” 

Some do pray yet still don't receive. The reason is because they pray a wordly man's prayer. The chief end of these prayers is not the glory of God but the glory of the self. “Hallowed by thy name” may proceed from their mouths but in reality, the exaltation of God is far from their hearts.

In an older post titled “The Love That Must be Stopped”, I wrote a three-point guide to diagnose if you are falling into worldliness:
You might be a world-lover if...
  1. You want to fulfill your desires outside of God's revealed will
  2. Visual delights arouse your desire for sinful acts
  3. You measure the worth of yourself and the worth of others by possessions and accomplishments
If your prayer is driven by any of these three elements, then God will not honor your prayers. Why? Simon Kistemaker explains:

“Greed is idolatry (Colossians 3:5) and that is an abomination in the sight of God. God does not listen to prayers that come from a heart filled with selfish motives. Covetousness and selfishness are insults to God.”5 

James 4:4 “You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God. “ 

In verse 4, there are two things about worldliness that make it dangerous to our souls
  1. It is spiritual adultery. It is no different from the Old Testament's depiction of Israel's unfaitfulness as harlotry (see the book of Hosea and his relationship with Gomer). But there is hope (See this older post titled “In Cash and in Kind”)
  2. It is enmity with God. Worldliness is opposed to God. You can love God and hate the world. Or love the world and hate God. But you cannot love both. There is no middle ground. If you love the world, you remain at enmity with God 


    The Holy Spirit Demands Total Allegiance
James 4:5 “Or do you think Scripture says without reason that the spirit he caused to live in us envies intensely?”

We have a little problem with regards to verse 5. Bible translators don't agree on how to translate it. Translators don't agree on how to translate it. I may sound authoritative if I preach as if I am certain about it, and may even impress some. But I would feel like an arrogant man if I'll do. I'll just present two plausible options and indicate my preference.

1st, The “spirit” the human spirit. When it says, “The spirit yearns jealousy”, it refers to the sinful human nature's uncontrollable lust, which is connected to verse 1.

2nd, The spirit is not human spirit but the Holy Spirit yearning jealousy when we engage in worldliness, when we engage in spiritual adultery.
This 2nd option is my preference. It calls to mind Exodus 34:14, Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.” He is the God who demands total allegiance; if we are into worldliness, then we are no longer true to our calling to be wholly dedicated to God.

Such is the high standard God sets for those who would serve him: total allegiance. Who is sufficient for all these things. I know I don't have that level of commitment. I know I have my selfish desires and I am powerless to subdue them. 

The God Who Gives Grace 
 At this point, verse 6 offers comfort: But he gives us more grace. That is why Scripture says: 
"God opposes the proud
but gives grace to the humble." 
Though he has set a high standard for us to follow him (total allegiance), he did not leave us on our own to fulfill his requirements. We are too poor spiritually for that.

God has set a high standard for wholehearted love and devotion on the part of his people, but he gives grace that is greater than the rigorous demand he has made.”6 

God's grace is sufficient to enable us to serve him in an undivided way. And in times we fail, his grace is sufficient to forgive and cover our sins. But he requires one thing for you to be receive that grace: Humility. James then quotes a God-inspired proverb: “ God opposes the proud, But gives grace to the humble” (Proverbs 3:34)

You can stay in your pride devising schemes on how to get want you want, even at the expense of hating people whom you perceive as hindrances to your dreams. Sure you can persist in that way. But remember, God's favor is not with you. The proverb says God is against you; he opposes you; he resists you.

Why not go the other way. Choose the path of humility. Humbling your self before him. Bowing down the knee to his sovereign control. Entrusting your desires in the hand of the Lord through prayer.

You may ask, “How about my desires? How about my dreams? How about my happiness?” Well, the proverb says, that if you will humble yourself before the Lord, there is grace-- more grace reserved for you. Draw near to God in prayer and believe that he rewards those who diligently seek him.
--------------------

ENDNOTES:
1. Unless otherwise indicated, scripture quotations are from the NIV 1984
2.  J. P. Louw & Eugene Nida, Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains (United Bible Societies, 1999)
3. John Macarthur, James (MNTC series; Moody Publishers 1998)
4. Donald Burdick (Expositor's Bible Commentary, 1st edition, Volume 12; Zondervan 1982)
5. Simon Kistemaker, Exposition of James (New Testament Commentary; Baker Books, 1986)
6. Donald Burdick (EBC)

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj is no Agabus


Abdul's comment is just one of the many this blog received a few hours after ABS-CBN's late night news program Bandila aired that shameful hoax. Though I have already posted about my general feeling about these comments, I decided to write a separate post on this one.

Abdul asserts that if I were present in the early church, I would brand Agabus as a false teacher just as I have done to Selvaraj. He claims that Agabus uttered two prophecies that did not came to pass:
i. that there would be a famine in the Roman world (Acts 11:28)
ii. that Paul would be bound and turned over to the Gentiles (Acts 21:10-11)

But is Abdul correct?

I. The Predicted Famine
"One of them named Agabus stood up and began to indicate by the Spirit that there would certainly be a great famine all over the world. And this took place in the reign of Claudius." (Acts 11:28 NASB)

There are records written by ancient historians of a series of bad harvests during the reign of Claudius that resulted in famine conditions:
  • Suetonius (Vita Claudius)
  • Tacitus (Annales)
  • Dio Cassius (History of Rome)
  • Orosius (History)

In addition to the historians mentioned above, there is a reference to a famine in Josephus' account of Queen Helena's conversion to Judaism. Josephus records that Helena's pilgrimage to Jerusalem at around 46 A.D. was advantageous to the people because:
"at that time the city was hard pressed by famine and many were perishing from want of money to purchase what they needed. Queen Helena sent some of her attendants to Alexandria to buy grain for large sums and others to Cyprus to bring back a cargo of dried figs. Her attendants speedily returned with these provisions, which she thereupon distributed among the needy. She has thus left a very great name that will be famous forever among our whole people for her benefaction." (Antiq. XX, 51-52 [ii.5]).
II. The Predicted Arrest of Paul
"As we were staying there for some days, a prophet named Agabus came down from Judea. And coming to us, he took Paul's belt and bound his own feet and hands, and said, "This is what the Holy Spirit says: 'In this way the Jews at Jerusalem will bind the man who owns this belt and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.'" (Acts 21:10-11 NASB)

This one makes me scratch my head. How could Abdul miss this? Unlike the first prophecy, one does not need to consult extra-bibical sources on this one. The fulfillment of the prophecy is indicated clearly in the text itself! (see verses 27-33)

Conclusion:
Agabus and Sevaraj belong to two different categories. The former is a genuine prophet affirmed by Luke's account and secular historians while the former is a false prophet by the standards of Deuteronomy 18:20-22 for serious blemishes in his recent track record (click HERE)

----------
Works consulted:
1. John Macarthur, The Macarthur Study Bible
2. Richard Longenecker, Acts in the Expositor's Bible Commentary (1st edition)

Monday, March 31, 2014

Comments received a few hours after Bandila aired that irresponsible "special report"



It's been more than a month now since ABS-CBN broadcasted that irresponsible special report on a "flesh-eating" skin disease "gradually spreading" in Pangasinan through it's late evening newscast Bandila. The 2nd part of the report was never shown on TV for in less than 24 hours, other media organizations and government authorities have conclusively shown that the report from the giant network was a hoax. The matter is now in the hands of the network's internal Ombudsman for investigation. For how long will this investigation process last? I have no idea.

The intent of this post however is not add more criticism to ABS-CBN for they received many already except from loyal fantards who would sing praises to the the network no matter what. This post is a personal lament. Though I'm glad and thankful that the Lord speedily exposed the falsehood of the report, I'm lamenting the fact that the incident manifested the gross lack of discernment in a large portion of the Filipino evangelical community. When I say "discernment", I simply mean the ability to distinguish what is right from what is wrong, the ability to identify the gem of truth from a pile falsehoods.

The Spirit of truth resides in us, right? The Spirit guides us, right? But why is it that within the hours immediately following the report of Bandila, the most vocal accessories in spreading the falsehood in social media are professing Christians? They are quick to tell the world, "See? We told you our prophets are for real!" They were also quick to confront fellow believers who questioned the credibility of their Indian prophets. Some of them found their way to my November 28 post Should Pangasinan Fear the Skin Disease Prophecy?: an Examination of Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj's Recent Track Record.

I've created a Facebook photo album of the comments I received the hours immediately following Bandila's special report. Click HERE